My tits are not harming the environment

In fact, I like to think they improve any environment I happen to be in.

However, Marks and Spencer wants to eliminate my carbon tit print.

Eco labels have become increasingly popular as shoppers make more effort to consume environmentally friendly products.

But now Marks & Spencer has made ‘going green’ even easier as it today launched the high street’s first ever carbon neutral bra.

Part of the new Autograph Leaves lingerie collection, the retail chain has calculated the footprint of the entire range, which includes four styles of bra, three knickers and a set of suspenders.

The figure, calculated by The Carbon Trust Footprinting Certification Company, takes into account each item’s complete life cycle – from component manufacture to transportation and even the energy customers use washing and drying their underwear.

The collection was manufactured at the M&S eco-model factory in Thurulie, Sri Lanka.

The innovative renewable energy features and reduced waste initiatives implemented at this site have helped reduce the carbon intensity of the energy used by an estimated 33%, compared to typical factory production.

Everything you need to know about the green movement can be summed up in those bolded words above: The Carbon Trust Footprinting Certification Company.

No one, and I mean no one, can convince me that the climate change cabal is anything but a money-making scheme, similar to the pet rock craze of the 70s.

Bring the Fresh!




6 Responses to “My tits are not harming the environment”

  1. Pete says:

    I dont think you just come out with a statement that your tits are no harming the environment I think you should get a second opinion

  2. Bobert says:

    “The collection was manufactured at the M&S eco-model factory in Thurulie, Sri Lanka.”

    I thought they said, M&Ms, almost put in an order; sigh :-(

  3. Barbara says:

    You definitely have a way with words! Too funny!

  4. Rich Fader says:

    This post is completely worthless without pictures.

  5. [...] RightGirl, the difference between pet rocks and carbon-hysteria schemes is that the latter destroy industry, and tend to take the economy down with it. [...]

  6. Jester says:

    Manufactured at a sweatshop by unpaid 6-year-olds in Sri Lanka? Great. And I thought the Left was all about “Fair Trade”. Guess it’s another case of do-as-i-say…

Leave a Reply