I wonder… if an internet poster were to call someone a Nazi without any factual basis, or accuse them of being part of the Klan, or repeatedly use profane language to describe women he didn’t agree with… could this case be used as precedent?
Something to keep in mind, I suppose.
Like cc?
Like cc?
No, like Kinsella…
Didn’t Kinsella call all posters at Free Dominion Nazis? Well I’m a member and I’m not a nazi, nor am I legally white so I am sure I have the grounds to take that piece of @##$$$ to the CHRC.
The leftards think they are untouchable because the HRCs are their half child, tick tock tick tock when they run out of Christians and Conservatives and Catholics they’ll need someone’s beliefs to persecute and feed on (like all parasites) and all that shall be left is the Muslim Faith and leftarded Ideology.
Tick tock tick tock.
It is what I would expect from the United Kingdom. I am very happy my father caught the orphan express in 1909 and becoming a bound boy for nine years before attaining his maturation. It was a very tough life for one so young. His younger brother joined my father in 1911 and ran away rather than face the conditions.
I am even happier that he had the good sense at 18 to head for the U.S. and relatives in Ohio.
CC came to mind for me, too.
CC came to mind for me, too.
Ok, how about CC AND Kinsella?
[...] HMMMM… who else could this apply to? “Injunction over Web libel sets precedent” …. [...]