Vagina Blogging

John Hawkins has an excellent piece today about some of the issues that women bloggers face – from men, and from other women. Truth be told, most of Pamela Gellar’s (Atlas Shrugs) detractors are other women (I know even I’ve gotten my hits in from time to time).

And Malkin… whoa. She hears about death threats to other female bloggers and can’t help but shrug. She gets them almost daily. She’s had to move ferkrissakes!

(We had) people posting photos of our past house…people urging their minions to come and stake out my house. ….I had tons of people email me and tell me they were going to come to my home. They posted my private phone number and I had dozens of people calling and leaving crude messages.

Although she’s not interviewed for this piece, my pal Kathy Shaidle is often subjected to rape threats… “If you just got properly laid… I’ll take one for the team…” that sort of rubbush.

As much as I am loath to admit that there has to be a difference between men and women bloggers posting about the very same subjects (in this case politics), sadly there is. Take liberal Canadian blogger Canadian Cynic. He used to have a whole category labeled “Cunt”, where he viciously maligned females in the news, and female bloggers. He has since removed categories from his blog, probably because of the flack he was taking, though really, he never seemed to mind. Believe me, it hasn’t stopped him from using the word, or maligning females. Former blogger Ian Scott of Ianisms (now defunct) had been banned from more than one blog for being downright creepy in a way that he certainly wouldn’t behave toward other men. Chances are he wouldn’t send a male blogger a pornographic description of what he would like to do to him!!

Does it bug me, personally? No, not really. I find it sad, but I have a “that’s just the way it is” attitude about it. When a male blogger/reader threatens a female blogger, he does it in a personal – often vulgar – way. When he threatens a male (if he has the balls to do so at all), he will usually do it by threatening his family, specifically his children. People who make internet threats are cowardly. They hide behind pseudonyms, don’t disclose email address or use fake ones, have cloaked IPs… they are pussies. Believe me, if they show up at your door and are greeted by your handgun, you’ll be scrubbing urine stains out of your Welcome mat.

Basically, we can’t let it get to us. Women have been silenced by men before, and we’ve ceased to allow it. We shouldn’t pay it any mind on the internet. There’s room for everyone here.

Update: Instead of adding anything worthwhile to the above subject, like a word from his female co-bloggers about any flack or threats or even support they may receive, Canadian Cynic instead chose to call me a cunt. Hmm…

Vagina Blogging II: Five More Women Speak Out




67 Responses to “Vagina Blogging”

  1. Wonder Woman says:

    “How about some Kwellada or some wax over at at your blog?”

    – Oh my. Isn’t that a witty retort? How will I ever recover?

    Awfully pussy-obsessed, aren’t we? I notice a lot of CC’s readers seem to be compulsively preoccupied with the amount of “porn” on my site. To much of a reminder that you share the world with girls? Or just glass-like sensibilities?

  2. The Phantom says:

    Sparky said: “…Phantom, try adding to the discourse with some facts.”

    Ok Sparky, I admit it. I made up the part about the one functioning synapse. What I should have said is that CC writes -as if- he had one synapse that works. Fact is, I’d take the opposite side of pretty much anything from CC because I think he’s ill mannered to women. I don’t like that.

    Since you requested facts, here’s one to match your blog post today: It is STUPID and DANGEROUS to feed the wild animals. The same thing happens to them as to welfare recipients. Meaning they hang around all the time looking for a hand out, they eat the landscaping, crap on the lawn and they get real pushy.

    A pushy wild turkey isn’t much of a problem (except for the turkey shit on the picnic table ) but a pushy buck deer? They have these big frickin’ horns, y’know. They aren’t shy of using them on you, either. I’d prefer a deerskin rug and a freezer full of venison to a horn in the guts, but then I’m a right wing fascist.

    Go thank your neighbor for shooting the damn turkey, he may have saved you a nasty bout of intestinal parasites, a flea infestation or maybe West Nile virus.

    Facts, Sparky. Inconvenient at times, but always true.

  3. The Phantom says:

    Oh darn, CC just removed my post over on his bog… I mean blog. Some people just don’t believe in free speech, do they?

    Say! I think that means CC isn’t having fun anymore. Poor CC, exposed as a humorless Leftist. Let’s all cry for poor CC.

    Ok, that’s enough crying.

  4. Ian says:

    CC said-
    By the way, GotR, it’s the absolute height of hypocrisy to whine about how right-wing screech harpy Michelle Malkin was forced to move, given her positively thuggish behaviour in terrorizing a number of students at UC Santa Cruz:

    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/18/111035/859

    Yes, GotR, read that slowly and carefully — how Malkin sicced her entire readership on a group of students, who received *death threats* because of it. And when those students begged Malkin to remove their personal info from her web site, she posted it *again*. So how about you knock off the sanctimonious moralizing and pearl clutching? It *so* doesn’t become you.

    Are we done here? Yeah, I think we’re done here.

    No We’re not.

    The students, by definition of their actions, were terrorists. And as typical ‘progressives’, meaning stupid publicity hunting liberals, released a PRESS RELEASE INCLUDING THEIR NAMES AND PHONE NUMBERS! Malkin just linked to their own press release.

    What you are hoping the sheeple don’t figure out, is that there is no difference at all between islamists and progressives. Look at the parallels- Imams preach hate, Professors preach hate. Islamists hate women, progressives hate women. Islamists preach overthrow of freedom, progressives preach the overthrow of government. Islamists blow up buildings and hummers, progressives burn hummers and buildings.

    Seem similar somehow?

  5. Sparky says:

    Did us a favour? Shooting a gun within city limits? What happened to that civil law abiding stuff that righties are all so famous for?
    Yeah, and feeding dem dar birdies is all dangerous and stuff. Sure.
    As for the rest–how would you put it?
    “After judicious consideration my dear Phantom…it certainly sounds like something you would do seeing as how you’re a right leaning, gun toting, truth denying reject with what appears to be a single functioning synapse on the one lonely brain cell in your giant vacuous cranium.
    Therefore I believe the naturalists I speak with, the outdoor shows I attend, and decades of experience in the great outdoors over anything that may come from your written word.”
    Sorry to RG for hijacking.
    Bringing it back, it was nice of her to offer the clarification in the comments–how about updating the post to reflect same?

  6. Nauseated says:

    To much of a reminder that you share the world with girls? Or just glass-like sensibilities?

    No…it’s just a lot of porn, you stupid twat.

  7. DFCtomm says:

    “By the way, GotR, it’s the absolute height of hypocrisy to whine about how right-wing screech harpy Michelle Malkin was forced to move, given her positively thuggish behaviour in terrorizing a number of students at UC Santa Cruz:

    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/18/111035/859

    Yes, GotR, read that slowly and carefully — how Malkin sicced her entire readership on a group of students, who received *death threats* because of it. And when those students begged Malkin to remove their personal info from her web site, she posted it *again*. So how about you knock off the sanctimonious moralizing and pearl clutching? It *so* doesn’t become you.

    Are we done here? Yeah, I think we’re done here.”

    Their contact information was obtained from a press release. Was Malkins? I don’t know about you but, I don’t give my address to Radio Shack so it’s not going into a press release. Your comparison doesn’t work unless Malkin’s contact info was gathered in a similar fashion, and if it was then fair is fair.

  8. Nauseated says:

    The students, by definition of their actions, were terrorists.

    Gee, I guess they don’t have police in Malkin-land anymore. What a disturbing development.

    Stop lying please.

  9. Frank says:

    Gosh, I must have hit a little too close to home because cc just deleted my last comment as well. I just don’t get it because what I said was I’m sorry that I said he can’t get a date because he’s a social retard and that the only reason I said that was because my cat died an I was a little upset. I figured if anyone would understand that situation it would be him afterall that was his excuse concerning the whole Wanda Watkins thing. I didn’t even make one comment about his weight or the greasy pony tail that’s soooo out of fashion. Speaking of fashion cc (because I know your reading this) you really should buy pants that fit. May I suggest a tall and portly store.

  10. sharonapple says:

    Talking about Malkin and her horrible behaviour to other people — what about Denice Denton or Graeme Frost, the 12-year-old boy she stalked. I guess they were terrorists too. I don’t approve of some of the behaviour towards her, but she lacks a certain decency towards people.

    Anyway, if you want to read the libertarian response, check out this blog:
    “It’s worth remembering that Denton didn’t actually do anything to anger Malkin and her readers. She simply failed to expel students who had sent the Malkinites into a fury.”
    http://www.reason.com/blog/show/114545.html

  11. sharonapple says:

    To be honest, I’d rather Malkin throw around the C-word and insults than people’s e-mail addresses and telephone numbers.

  12. The Phantom says:

    Sparky, Sparky, Sparky. If you want to take comments meant for CC upon yourself, well there’s not much I can do about that.

    I assumed you lived in the country, based on that picture you posted. Nice view for the city. I live in the city too. I have deer coming into my backyard because they’ve eaten everything in the woods. They’ve eaten the woods clean already this year because there are too many of them for the available food and they are fucking starving. Starvation is what it would take to make a deer walk all the way to my house from the woods in the daytime.

    Shooting a few would seem to be indicated. Shooting them in my backyard might be somewhat unsafe, maybe hunting them in the woods…?

    Aaaany way, if you do live in the city it would seem highly unlikely that some meanie/right winger/liar/thug person like myself shot the nice turkey. This is Canada, people go to jail for doing shit like that. (Well, except in Toronto but only if they’re shooting at a person.)

    Maybe it got run over by a car. That happens when morons in suburbia feed wild animals. It isn’t just bad for you Sparky, its bad for them too.

    Now be a good bunny hugger, run back to CC’s and tell him I said he was a humorless Communist who fights with girls because he lacks the guts to fight with boys.

  13. Kevin says:

    CC : Those students released their own private information including their phone numbers in their own press release. Michelle merely quoted it.

    Lessons to be learned there. First of all don’t reveal information you don’t want on the front page of a newspaper on the internet. Secondly, if you do, and it does end up on the front page of a newspaper, you have nobody to blame but yourself.

    Thus endeth the lesson….and this stupid debate.

  14. The Phantom says:

    Oooh, CC put up a whole post all about ME, Right Girl! Isn’t that exciting?!!!!

    I think you’ve struck his one functioning nerve with this post. He’s really having no fun today.

  15. irwin daisy says:

    I have a question, why does anybody even acknowledge the vile filth, otherwise known as ‘canadian cynic?’

    This morons biggest response to a post is 11 comments, with 7 coming from bi-guy. It appears his overall average is 2 comments per post. People don’t read or react to his feelings. And little wonder with posts like this:

    “Kate McMillan: Lying piece of shit. And the CC “Small Dead Animals” challenge.”

    “Really, I had wanted to raise the level of discourse around here but when you’re dealing with a hideously dishonest, putrid, steaming turd like Kate McMillan, well, civility just has to take a back seat.”

    Like McClelland, Kinsella, et al. This bottom feeder leftard blogger stands as another example of the best online recruiting tool Conservatives have going.

  16. [...] I mentioned that women bloggers tend to get insulted on the basis of their looks and gender, and a bunch of mysogynists called me a fat c*nt, thereby proving my [...]

  17. [...] an insight into the phenomenon, check out the comments at Right Girl. (Language [...]

Leave a Reply